Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This just illustrates that this specific competition has become meaningless. It might measure their auditory reaction time more than their sprinting speed.


They are measuring the human, and all aspects of the human.

If a faster auditory reaction is intrinsic to the abilities of the runner, then that's an advantage they can exploit.


It's a literal race to see who is the fastest - that includes reaction time would it not?


Does it?

I join millions of other people who find it enjoyable to watch. By that measure it's meaningful. In fact, more meaningful than the _vast_ majority of Olympic events which have less parity and orders of magnitude fewer viewers.


We are using “meaningful” in two different senses. Of course, what people find meaning in isn’t necessarily rational.


In what way is someone who still finds this event meaningful engaging in irrationality?

Every competition has factors preceding and during the moments of measured performance that are like this. You could also say that a runner’s performance is about their ability to train consistently, apply self discipline to their daily lives, perform under pressure, etc.

It seems odd to me that in the sum of all moments leading up to the start of a race, somehow reaction time would no longer be relevant.

If a runner gets distracted by the crowd, that’s just as impactful to the race but has nothing to do with their potential speed. The race is a measurement of all factors - mental and physical - and all participants are measured the same way.


In every race the reaction time is a key factor. Don't see how you could exclude that factor from a race.


To my knowledge the 40-yard dash (NFL combine) timer starts when the runner starts.

I don't think this method would be as entertaining to watch.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: