Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have had good results with the GL.iNet routers too, but the "supported by openwrt" just means that GL.iNet pulled an old version of OpenWRT and hacked it up until it worked on their board instead of making their own OEM firmware. They're not upstreaming their patches or collaborating with OpenWRT, just kind of leeching off them.

I'm not even sure you can install vanilla OpenWRT on the Flint 2 yet.

In contrast, this is made by and with the OpenWRT dev team!



Is [0] not a patch adding support to OpenWRT?

It looks like the developer has committed previously to the Linux kernel as well, so they seem to be upstreaming at least some of their patches?

[0] https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=fe...


I think it is officially supported, but honestly I use firmware from GL.Inet web interface is great


Afaik it hasn’t reached OpenWrt stable yet


It looks like the patch was committed in late September [0] and the press release for the device is dated mid November [1]. So unless I'm reading things wrong they added support upstream before they released the product?

0: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=fe...

1: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/kn38opoklmwx22am6b1fm/h/Press...


using Qualcomm for wifi6 is mainly the reason why, their SDK is very picky, and kept out of tree on purpose




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: